Community discussions

MikroTik App

Search found 13 matches

by rkadmins
Thu Jan 14, 2021 2:00 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.48 [stable] is released!
Replies: 295
Views: 129207

Re: v6.48 [stable] is released!

any more specific ideas, regarding that is more that 50 ipsec on the server? Client side # jan/13/2021 13:02:56 by RouterOS 6.48 # software id = 1R3H-GDJM # # model = RBM33G # serial number = A2FD0C7A4D0D /ip ipsec policy group add name=ikev2-group /ip ipsec profile add dh-group=modp2048 enc-algori...
by rkadmins
Wed Jan 13, 2021 9:33 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.48 [stable] is released!
Replies: 295
Views: 129207

Re: v6.48 [stable] is released!

Changing it at one peer in a pair only will not solve the issue. It must be changed at both peers. Whether it is a bug introduced or a bug fixed is unclear to me.
downgraded server (CHR) to 6.47.8 and no errors. Will wait for the fix of this.
by rkadmins
Wed Jan 13, 2021 3:16 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.48 [stable] is released!
Replies: 295
Views: 129207

Re: v6.48 [stable] is released!

Always was thinking, that proposals must be exactly the same, from both sides of ipsec, am i wrong?? Correct, they must be the same at both sides. However, it seems 6.48 has a problem if you ask it not to use the pfs key from the initial establishment of Phase 2 by specifying a value in pfs-group i...
by rkadmins
Wed Jan 13, 2021 3:06 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.48 [stable] is released!
Replies: 295
Views: 129207

Re: v6.48 [stable] is released!

any more specific ideas, regarding that is more that 50 ipsec on the server? My understanding of the references to pfs-group in the current topic and in the one @eworm refers to (in a post which itself does not contain the keyword pfs) is the following: pfs is always used in IKEv2 if you set the pf...
by rkadmins
Wed Jan 13, 2021 1:15 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.48 [stable] is released!
Replies: 295
Views: 129207

Re: v6.48 [stable] is released!

any more specific ideas, regarding that is more that 50 ipsec on the server? Client side # jan/13/2021 13:02:56 by RouterOS 6.48 # software id = 1R3H-GDJM # # model = RBM33G # serial number = A2FD0C7A4D0D /ip ipsec policy group add name=ikev2-group /ip ipsec profile add dh-group=modp2048 enc-algorit...
by rkadmins
Wed Jan 13, 2021 12:58 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.48 [stable] is released!
Replies: 295
Views: 129207

Re: v6.48 [stable] is released!

reviewed all this, found some problems, where people was wrong setup and using default proposals, and still no answer - in my case PFS group and proposals are setuped correctly, on both sides. If on both sides in proposals PFS group is 2048 and lifetime 30, is it a mistake? Search this thread for p...
by rkadmins
Wed Jan 13, 2021 12:37 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.48 [stable] is released!
Replies: 295
Views: 129207

Re: v6.48 [stable] is released!

any ideas why upgrade causes full of errors regarding IKE2 rekey? https://forum.mikrotik.com/search.php?keywords=rekey&t=171035&sf=msgonly reviewed all this, found some problems, where people was wrong setup and using default proposals, and still no answer - in my case PFS group and proposa...
by rkadmins
Wed Jan 13, 2021 12:26 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.48 [stable] is released!
Replies: 295
Views: 129207

Re: v6.48 [stable] is released!

any ideas why upgrade causes full of errors regarding IKE2 rekey?
50+ devices upgraded, with correct setup of PFS groups on both sides, and every 30 minutes - rekey failed, OSPF goes down
by rkadmins
Mon Oct 26, 2020 2:06 pm
Forum: General
Topic: "Holy war" against masquerade and ike2 dynamic ip address on your wan interface
Replies: 8
Views: 1165

Re: "Holy war" against masquerade and ike2 dynamic ip address on your wan interface

The script can be the follows, but anyway, hope this is not the solution at all... : do { :local lte1ip [/ip address get [find address~"/32" and interface=lte1] address]; :local defroute [/ip route get [find distance=1 and gateway=lte1 and disabled=no and dst-address="0.0.0.0/0"]...
by rkadmins
Mon Oct 26, 2020 10:47 am
Forum: General
Topic: "Holy war" against masquerade and ike2 dynamic ip address on your wan interface
Replies: 8
Views: 1165

Re: "Holy war" against masquerade and ike2 dynamic ip address on your wan interface

hi guys [xxxxxx@MikroTikxxxx] /ip address> print Flags: X - disabled, I - invalid, D - dynamic # ADDRESS NETWORK INTERFACE 2 192.168.1.1/24 192.168.1.0 local 3 D 85.yyy.xxx.71/32 85.yyy.xxx.71 lte1 4 D 172.16.252.236/24 172.16.252.0 lte1 [xxxxx@MikroTikxxxxx] /ip route> print where dst-address="...
by rkadmins
Fri Oct 23, 2020 5:19 pm
Forum: General
Topic: "Holy war" against masquerade and ike2 dynamic ip address on your wan interface
Replies: 8
Views: 1165

Re: "Holy war" against masquerade and ike2 dynamic ip address on your wan interface

I don't have any LTE to test with, but does it have an equivalent of DHCP's lease script? If so, you can update anything you want from there. Thanks for your answer. The LTE is taking parameters from LTE APN, where you can only choose "Add Default Route" option, and can edit the Default R...
by rkadmins
Fri Oct 23, 2020 10:48 am
Forum: General
Topic: "Holy war" against masquerade and ike2 dynamic ip address on your wan interface
Replies: 8
Views: 1165

"Holy war" against masquerade and ike2 dynamic ip address on your wan interface

Hello everybody... Situation is quite clear. SXTR Lte6 Mikrotik, dynamic ip address getting from mobile operator. For example 1.2.3.4 SXTR is connecting to Ikev2 VPN server(CHR), getting all ip setup from mode-config. As the result - we have additional IP address on the LTE1 interface. For example (...
by rkadmins
Wed Apr 25, 2018 3:42 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.42.1 [current]
Replies: 272
Views: 100194

Re: v6.42.1 [current]

in the winbox, BRIDGE section is showing NOTHING in PORTS section.

If you select Detail Mode - ports are showing.

Winbox - last verstion, RouterOS 6.42.1 .
On the 6.42 version everything was ok.

Any ideas???