So now to your actual issue, since it doesn't seem to be a band support issue, what exactly does /interface lte monitor info 0 show on the LtAP mini, esp. the field access-technology?
YES!We need asap something like EPMP3000 mu-mimo 4x4 with GPS sync compatible with NV2 and 802.11N/AC client
Dont step backI didn't say wAP and I didn't say when But yes, we are always working on new and exciting products
Impossible:yeee single TCP stream 240 Mbit from 40 Mhz Mby in lab.This is not AC mode, AC mode will reach around 240Mbps on 40MHz
Already know the answer. Both units need to be 6.44 to have all CLI bandwidth features working.WirelessRudy - Do you have an access to this IP address? Please provide supout file from your router to firstname.lastname@example.org. Speed Test works just fine for me to/from all accessible IP addresses;
236 changes to have new bugs introduced.....Congratulations on this massive release with 236 changes. I'm really looking forward to test.
Thx a lot!
That's a pity! Can we expect some change in the future?chipset limit is 8
I beleive 130 is roughly half of 240-280........Really? No way man, Ubnt AC 240-280Mbps on 40Mhz at 8km Around 130Mbps at 20MHz...
If you get 240Mbps on 80MHz then you get half of that on 40Mhz....We have dishes alu for LDF AC, LHG AC and others.
240Mbps stable on 80MHz? How many we can reach at 40MHz? 50Mbps?
6.43.8Perfect.What version of routeros are you using in arm and mispbe cpes? Thanks for sharing with us your results.
who?share configuration please
Use csma + RTS/CTS and you're fine...Please @Mikrotik we only need that arm works in one protocolo very well, only one...
I made the screenshot straight from the mikrotik website, grabbed it and put it on the post. So the post was showing an up to date screenshot no more then 5 mins old.......BTW that screenshot is from the old brochure. I mean later today we will add some more stuff for you.
Thanks.I know that you will nitpick this ad infinitum, but I agree, I will make sure the brochure is more clear about this, so everyone can understand it.
Screenshot 2018-12-20 at 11.46.59.png
Agree.Three "stable" releases in just over a week seems to be rather a contradiction in terms to me.
Perhaps "current" really was the correct name.
OH! So I'll sit and wait again.... Getting a bit frustrated over arm devices and NV2.....*) wireless - improved Nv2 reliability on ARM devices;
I'm sorry to indicate that the nv2 protocol on arm devices continues to fail. It is unstable and has packet loss. Nstreme is still the best option
Would be nice to get some better explanation on these data (I am not talking the values!)signal: 80
tx-sector-info: right 1.4 degrees, down 1 degrees
viewtopic.php?t=116480#p577004Any idea why sometimes WLAN drop my connection by this reason: Unicast key exchange timeout
Right.. and True"Keep a Topic. I do not care about GPS. Currently NV2 itself does not work properly. NV2 needs to be addressed in particular.
Good! When can we finally buy them?Those are real field tests
And 60Ghz Wireless Wire Dish?It is already available.How soon will the LtAP mini LTE kit be made available for purchase?
For AP? Because for station any 20/40/80 setting wil work with AP. No matter what AP is using. As long as the frequency of the scan range can 'see' the AP it will adapt.Ce - eC automatic selection? Just a guess.
?? How is that? It can only be Ce or eC. The eCe would make a 60Mhz wide channel which is not supported by 802.11acMaybe set your wifi channel to combined ce and ec!What is the wireless XX option under Channel width?
Indeed, that what I would like to know too.....What is the wireless XX option under Channel width?